glhcarl said:I would describe the difference between the two this way: the RR was Mary Ann and the GTX was Ginger. :drive:
sixgunrunner68 said:I wouldn't even entertain that with a response. That's an ignorant comment to say the least. :chuck:
Well said :cheers:glhcarl said:I would describe the difference between the two this way: the RR was Mary Ann and the GTX was Ginger. :drive:
One thing for sure - they both would be a good ride.69hemibeep said:Well said :cheers:glhcarl said:I would describe the difference between the two this way: the RR was Mary Ann and the GTX was Ginger. :drive:
glhcarl said:I would describe the difference between the two this way: the RR was Mary Ann and the GTX was Ginger. :drive:
Me likes the way you thinks...wannarunner said:I like the notion of the RR stripped down to do battle.
Hard to argue with 510 ft. lbs. of torque and ice cold air conditioning...even if it isn't a MoPar... :yesnod:wannarunner said:If I wanted a "cushy" muscle car, I would probably go Buick GS or something along that line.
Basketcase said:some people say stupid crap like that just to show you what a dumbass they really are.... :soap:
roadrunnerh said:Basketcase said:some people say stupid crap like that just to show you what a dumbass they really are.... :soap:
It's the same car - but GTXs have more options - usually.
The base motor in the X is bigger 440 vs 383, but for '68 they both could have the optional HEMI. Is a 1968 HEMI GTX better than a '68 Hemi Road Runner?
If you're going to put it that way, then it's Mary Ann, no boubt about it! :banana:glhcarl said:I would describe the difference between the two this way: the RR was Mary Ann and the GTX was Ginger. :drive: