cash for clunkers....this isnt good

george68hemirr

I think you guys are full of shit.
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
12,645
Reaction score
71
Location
hudson valley ny
I guess I must be on the wrong page…


A vehicle at 15 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 800 gallons a year of gasoline.

A vehicle at 25 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 480 gallons a year.

So, the average "Cash for Clunkers" transaction will reduce US gasoline consumption by 320 gallons per year.

They claim 700,000 vehicles – so that's 224 million gallons / year.

That equates to a bit over 5 million barrels of oil.

5 million barrels of oil is about ¼ of one day's US consumption.

And, 5 million barrels of oil costs about $350 million dollars at $70/bbl.

So, we all contributed to spending $3 billion to save $350 million.

How good a deal was that ???

They'll probably do a great job with health care though!!
 

SomeCarGuy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
1,241
Reaction score
45
Location
Sometown in KY
Good, more gas for me and my RR :cheers:

Really though, it was a kick back to the UAW to keep them working and hopefully make their new gifts called Chrysler and General Motors turn a profit.

It is really a tax on poor people as well. There went their cash cars to buy. Look for a freebie for the poor next year about this time right before the election to help them with this gubment made problem.
 

george68hemirr

I think you guys are full of shit.
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
12,645
Reaction score
71
Location
hudson valley ny
SomeCarGuy said:
Good, more gas for me and my RR :cheers:

Really though, it was a kick back to the UAW to keep them working and hopefully make their new gifts called Chrysler and General Motors turn a profit.

It is really a tax on poor people as well. There went their cash cars to buy. Look for a freebie for the poor next year about this time right before the election to help them with this gubment made problem.


very true :yesnod:
 

jays69bird

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
5
Location
Oswego
SomeCarGuy said:
Good, more gas for me and my RR :cheers:

Really though, it was a kick back to the UAW to keep them working and hopefully make their new gifts called Chrysler and General Motors turn a profit.

It is really a tax on poor people as well. There went their cash cars to buy. Look for a freebie for the poor next year about this time right before the election to help them with this gubment made problem.
Didn't work cause only two American cars on the top ten list and they were Ford's the company that didn't take gov.money
 

jays69bird

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
5
Location
Oswego
george68hemirr said:
I guess I must be on the wrong page…


A vehicle at 15 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 800 gallons a year of gasoline.

A vehicle at 25 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 480 gallons a year.

So, the average "Cash for Clunkers" transaction will reduce US gasoline consumption by 320 gallons per year.

They claim 700,000 vehicles – so that's 224 million gallons / year.

That equates to a bit over 5 million barrels of oil.

5 million barrels of oil is about ¼ of one day's US consumption.

And, 5 million barrels of oil costs about $350 million dollars at $70/bbl.

So, we all contributed to spending $3 billion to save $350 million.

How good a deal was that ???

They'll probably do a great job with health care though!!
That's our government,step over a 20 dollar bill to pick up a nickel. :yesnod:
 
Back
Top