• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

New Challenger SUPERBIRD coversion

Roadcuda

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
10,540
Reaction score
286
Location
Rocky Hill, Ct
There are some things that shouldn't be copied, and this is one of those things! :brickwall:
 

Collin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
876
Reaction score
5
Hahaha I knew this would draw out some good comments

Looks horrible in my opinion, it looks like a drawing from CARS
 

chapdog105

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
636
Reaction score
1
Location
Detroit, MI
Wasn't the general consensus on the 1970 Superbird similar to these negative comments when it was introduced?
I think it's ugly too, but it's worth the argument....
 

Jim S.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
1,798
Reaction score
0
Location
White Bear Lake, Mn.
chapdog105 said:
Wasn't the general consensus on the 1970 Superbird similar to these negative comments when it was introduced?
I think it's ugly too, but it's worth the argument....

You are right. To the point the dealers were pulling the nose cone and wing trying to sell them as 70 RRs.
As far as this new challenger, well, IMHO........... :puke:
 

69hemibeep

Sponge Bob Square Wheels
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
22,148
Reaction score
2,358
Location
AZ Desert,
roadrunnerh said:
I certainly hope that doesn't go into production.... :puke:
Not going to happen. This is an aftermarket company that's been at it for a couple of years now, you would think they would have gone broke by now :basketcase:
 

moparchris

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
4,814
Reaction score
38
Location
costa mesa ca
chapdog105 said:
Wasn't the general consensus on the 1970 Superbird similar to these negative comments when it was introduced?
I think it's ugly too, but it's worth the argument....
I will take this. The Superbird and Daytona were simply a tool to go fast. Form followed function. This pile of crap is just a wanna be since you wont see one on any race track and Ma Mopar didn't engineer it to be the most wicked production car to hit the high banks. They drew the negative comments but Chrysler didn't care, it won races. Its kinda like putting Hemi badges on your Neon. You wanna look the part but its merely a poor imposter with no purpose.
 

moparstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
6,627
Reaction score
7
Location
overland park ks / odessa missouri
moparchris said:
chapdog105 said:
Wasn't the general consensus on the 1970 Superbird similar to these negative comments when it was introduced?
I think it's ugly too, but it's worth the argument....
I will take this. The Superbird and Daytona were simply a tool to go fast. Form followed function. This pile of crap is just a wanna be since you wont see one on any race track and Ma Mopar didn't engineer it to be the most wicked production car to hit the high banks. They drew the negative comments but Chrysler didn't care, it won races. Its kinda like putting Hemi badges on your Neon. You wanna look the part but its merely a poor imposter with no purpose.
:yesnod: :yesnod: :yesnod: :yesnod: :yesnod: :yesnod: :yesnod: :yesnod: look the chevy guy even knows wing cars are the best :basketcase: :basketcase: :basketcase: :basketcase:

3108497wing girl dc sdefgt.jpg
 

abodybill

Senior Citizen Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
4
Location
MI. Farm
That car falls just ahead of the Camaro for being in the ugly contest! :puke: :puke:
 
Back
Top